![]() Get a WAV from SHM and you can expect being closer to the actual source which apparently often wasn't even that bad compared to vinyl.Īudio quality has been problematic in every direction you can process and distribute it ever since it went digital, which was supposed to be noiseless, easy to edit etc. The difference between a regular CD rip and SHM-CD rip can be staggering (let alone the CD's battling it out on a budget CD player), but those SHM-CD releases are usually also remasters, of course. In Japan they've managed to bypass a lot of the issue using different plastic -from computer monitors- so you actually get the correct bits out more often. Even if you -in general- have a brand new CD with perfect production values, the optical reader's error correction and software conversion process may introduce significant losses, and not a single WAV of the same CD will contain the exact same data, maybe just enough bits. That has nothing to do with your WAVs, of course.but creating a WAV still means depending on error correction, a decent CD, and reflective plastic is an issue. ![]() I'm still digging around in my memory so I'll just go on LOL.Decades ago, you'd get a wav creator demo with a soundcard, computer, PC mag.so people would create WAV files, be shocked about the size and then scale back the settings. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |